Comments on: Kingston SSDNow UV400 SSD Review (480GB) https://www.thessdreview.com/featured/kingston-ssdnow-uv400-ssd-review-480gb/ The Worlds Dedicated SSD Education and Review Resource | Fri, 17 Nov 2017 02:03:13 +0000 hourly 1 By: Scour https://www.thessdreview.com/featured/kingston-ssdnow-uv400-ssd-review-480gb/#comment-23494 Mon, 25 Jul 2016 19:16:00 +0000 https://www.thessdreview.com/?p=93053#comment-23494 Thanks for the review.

Maybe it´s OK for a notebook, for my PC I need a bit more MB/s if writing big data

]]> By: John https://www.thessdreview.com/featured/kingston-ssdnow-uv400-ssd-review-480gb/#comment-23488 Mon, 25 Jul 2016 11:56:00 +0000 https://www.thessdreview.com/?p=93053#comment-23488 “Because of this, Kingston has always had products to fulfill this market segment under their SSDNow series…”
Phrased another way, Kingston always strives to win the race to the bottom with their SSDNow series.

]]> By: HERETIC https://www.thessdreview.com/featured/kingston-ssdnow-uv400-ssd-review-480gb/#comment-23486 Sun, 24 Jul 2016 06:10:00 +0000 https://www.thessdreview.com/?p=93053#comment-23486 Hi Sean.
Looking at HD Tune fast cache-seems to be about 36 GB.
30 GB file copy should have screamed along at 450+.
Perhaps drive hadn’t had enough time to clear/clean up cache???????????
Know smaller drives with 8 to 12 GB cache tend to really suffer…………….

]]>