<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Intel 600P M.2 NVMe SSD Review (512GB) &#8211; Is It THE Budget NVMe SSD to buy?	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.thessdreview.com/featured/intel-600p-m-2-nvme-ssd-review-512gb/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.thessdreview.com/featured/intel-600p-m-2-nvme-ssd-review-512gb/</link>
	<description>The Worlds Dedicated SSD Education and Review Resource &#124;</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2017 06:08:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Matt Abercrombie		</title>
		<link>https://www.thessdreview.com/featured/intel-600p-m-2-nvme-ssd-review-512gb/#comment-23857</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Matt Abercrombie]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2017 06:08:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.thessdreview.com/?p=94513#comment-23857</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The ATTO results make sense as the 600p doesn&#039;t have a controller that supports direct to die algorithm to relieve the bottle neck that occurs once the SLC cache is full. That being said very few program reads, go above 128K in windows. So, everything past that is just large file transfer, and really inconsequential in day to day compute performance outside of OS install.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The ATTO results make sense as the 600p doesn&#8217;t have a controller that supports direct to die algorithm to relieve the bottle neck that occurs once the SLC cache is full. That being said very few program reads, go above 128K in windows. So, everything past that is just large file transfer, and really inconsequential in day to day compute performance outside of OS install.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: HERETIC		</title>
		<link>https://www.thessdreview.com/featured/intel-600p-m-2-nvme-ssd-review-512gb/#comment-23787</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[HERETIC]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Dec 2016 04:09:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.thessdreview.com/?p=94513#comment-23787</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Passed my first test-At least 8K-IOPS-QD1.
Failed my second-Must write 200+ after buffer
can&#039;t have it bottleneck my spinning rust.


Write speed shocked me for a 500 size drive
those speeds you expect on a 120 size drive.
And why the SLC cache so small???????]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Passed my first test-At least 8K-IOPS-QD1.<br />
Failed my second-Must write 200+ after buffer<br />
can&#8217;t have it bottleneck my spinning rust.</p>
<p>Write speed shocked me for a 500 size drive<br />
those speeds you expect on a 120 size drive.<br />
And why the SLC cache so small???????</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
