<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: SMART High Reliability Solutions Announces HRS-M1 Highly Ruggedized SSD With MLC NAND	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.thessdreview.com/daily-news/smart-high-reliability-solutions-announces-hrs-m1-highly-ruggedized-ssd-with-mlc-nand/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.thessdreview.com/daily-news/smart-high-reliability-solutions-announces-hrs-m1-highly-ruggedized-ssd-with-mlc-nand/</link>
	<description>The Worlds Dedicated SSD Education and Review Resource &#124;</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Nov 2016 12:04:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Fred		</title>
		<link>https://www.thessdreview.com/daily-news/smart-high-reliability-solutions-announces-hrs-m1-highly-ruggedized-ssd-with-mlc-nand/#comment-23707</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Fred]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Nov 2016 12:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.thessdreview.com/?p=94190#comment-23707</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.thessdreview.com/daily-news/smart-high-reliability-solutions-announces-hrs-m1-highly-ruggedized-ssd-with-mlc-nand/#comment-23705&quot;&gt;renosablast&lt;/a&gt;.

Also no mention of power loss protection for a &quot;High Reliability System&quot; or the actual NAND source used adds to the perception that this is a piece of marketing fluff. Yet another mildly modified press release via TSR.  It would be nice if useful added value information like that was included. Until it is this thing is a &quot;mystery pig in a poke&quot;.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.thessdreview.com/daily-news/smart-high-reliability-solutions-announces-hrs-m1-highly-ruggedized-ssd-with-mlc-nand/#comment-23705">renosablast</a>.</p>
<p>Also no mention of power loss protection for a &#8220;High Reliability System&#8221; or the actual NAND source used adds to the perception that this is a piece of marketing fluff. Yet another mildly modified press release via TSR.  It would be nice if useful added value information like that was included. Until it is this thing is a &#8220;mystery pig in a poke&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: renosablast		</title>
		<link>https://www.thessdreview.com/daily-news/smart-high-reliability-solutions-announces-hrs-m1-highly-ruggedized-ssd-with-mlc-nand/#comment-23705</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[renosablast]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Nov 2016 21:22:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.thessdreview.com/?p=94190#comment-23705</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[SMART HRS does not specify what controller is used. However, the enterprise versions of the Sandforce SF3700 series are only rated for maximum sequential read speeds of up to 500MB/s through a SATA 6Gb/s interface.  The HRS-M1 is rated for up to 525MB/s.  Not likely a Sandforce controller being used.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>SMART HRS does not specify what controller is used. However, the enterprise versions of the Sandforce SF3700 series are only rated for maximum sequential read speeds of up to 500MB/s through a SATA 6Gb/s interface.  The HRS-M1 is rated for up to 525MB/s.  Not likely a Sandforce controller being used.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Mike		</title>
		<link>https://www.thessdreview.com/daily-news/smart-high-reliability-solutions-announces-hrs-m1-highly-ruggedized-ssd-with-mlc-nand/#comment-23704</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mike]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Nov 2016 20:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.thessdreview.com/?p=94190#comment-23704</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Is this a Seagate Sandforce controller? Looks somewhat like Intel 520 specs. When is Seagate going to unleash Sandforce? Were waiting. How many years have Seagate had Sandforce where are the ssds?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is this a Seagate Sandforce controller? Looks somewhat like Intel 520 specs. When is Seagate going to unleash Sandforce? Were waiting. How many years have Seagate had Sandforce where are the ssds?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
