<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: VIA Announces Upcoming SSD Processor Design Based On Tensilica IP	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.thessdreview.com/daily-news/latest-buzz/via-announces-upcoming-ssd-processor-design-based-on-tensilica-ip/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.thessdreview.com/daily-news/latest-buzz/via-announces-upcoming-ssd-processor-design-based-on-tensilica-ip/</link>
	<description>The Worlds Dedicated SSD Education and Review Resource &#124;</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Feb 2012 07:04:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: paul alcorn		</title>
		<link>https://www.thessdreview.com/daily-news/latest-buzz/via-announces-upcoming-ssd-processor-design-based-on-tensilica-ip/#comment-9382</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[paul alcorn]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Feb 2012 07:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://thessdreview.com/?p=41108#comment-9382</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[based upon a MIPS processor, while heavily tweaked, will make for an interesting entrant. I am excited to see this, for some reason this announcement reminds me of when the Idilinx BareFoot controller was announced months before launch.... waited waited and waited...and on launch it was a giant leap forward.
Heres hoping my hunch is correct!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>based upon a MIPS processor, while heavily tweaked, will make for an interesting entrant. I am excited to see this, for some reason this announcement reminds me of when the Idilinx BareFoot controller was announced months before launch&#8230;. waited waited and waited&#8230;and on launch it was a giant leap forward.<br />
Heres hoping my hunch is correct!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Josh Zale		</title>
		<link>https://www.thessdreview.com/daily-news/latest-buzz/via-announces-upcoming-ssd-processor-design-based-on-tensilica-ip/#comment-9377</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Josh Zale]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2012 21:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://thessdreview.com/?p=41108#comment-9377</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.thessdreview.com/daily-news/latest-buzz/via-announces-upcoming-ssd-processor-design-based-on-tensilica-ip/#comment-9370&quot;&gt;Zaxx&lt;/a&gt;.

Seeing as the controller hasn&#039;t yet been released, I wouldn&#039;t jump the gun when it comes to performance vs capacity. VIA has been known to have one or two tricks up their sleeve and I wouldn&#039;t be surprised if their SSD processor ends up exceeding everyone&#039;s expectations. I&#039;m sure we&#039;ll find out soon enough. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.thessdreview.com/daily-news/latest-buzz/via-announces-upcoming-ssd-processor-design-based-on-tensilica-ip/#comment-9370">Zaxx</a>.</p>
<p>Seeing as the controller hasn&#8217;t yet been released, I wouldn&#8217;t jump the gun when it comes to performance vs capacity. VIA has been known to have one or two tricks up their sleeve and I wouldn&#8217;t be surprised if their SSD processor ends up exceeding everyone&#8217;s expectations. I&#8217;m sure we&#8217;ll find out soon enough. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Zaxx		</title>
		<link>https://www.thessdreview.com/daily-news/latest-buzz/via-announces-upcoming-ssd-processor-design-based-on-tensilica-ip/#comment-9370</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zaxx]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2012 06:06:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://thessdreview.com/?p=41108#comment-9370</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[This is all wonderful and great but by the time they make it to market you&#039;ll have to buy a 1TB size SSD to see these outstanding gains in performance. Like the new Octane...great numbers no matter the data type with with consumer realistic queue depths of 1-4 but if you want to see it&#039;s best performance you have to spend $900 or more for the 512GB drive. Someone, somewhere needs to figure out what it takes to maintain high performance in a reasonable size drive. Atm the SF2281 120gb drives are right on the edge with satisfactory performance without having the step to the 240GB hotrod. I&#039;m hoping the soon to hit 24nm toggle doesn&#039;t take too much of a random write hit (ie the 34nm to 25nm transition we all loved so well...NOT). Imo the Vertex 2 50GB 34nm drives were the last of the &#039;poor mans raid&#039; era. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is all wonderful and great but by the time they make it to market you&#8217;ll have to buy a 1TB size SSD to see these outstanding gains in performance. Like the new Octane&#8230;great numbers no matter the data type with with consumer realistic queue depths of 1-4 but if you want to see it&#8217;s best performance you have to spend $900 or more for the 512GB drive. Someone, somewhere needs to figure out what it takes to maintain high performance in a reasonable size drive. Atm the SF2281 120gb drives are right on the edge with satisfactory performance without having the step to the 240GB hotrod. I&#8217;m hoping the soon to hit 24nm toggle doesn&#8217;t take too much of a random write hit (ie the 34nm to 25nm transition we all loved so well&#8230;NOT). Imo the Vertex 2 50GB 34nm drives were the last of the &#8216;poor mans raid&#8217; era. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
