<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: SSD of the Week &#8211; Kingston HyperX Savage	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.thessdreview.com/daily-news/latest-buzz/ssd-of-the-week-kingston-hyperx-savage/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.thessdreview.com/daily-news/latest-buzz/ssd-of-the-week-kingston-hyperx-savage/</link>
	<description>The Worlds Dedicated SSD Education and Review Resource &#124;</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2015 20:02:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Dan		</title>
		<link>https://www.thessdreview.com/daily-news/latest-buzz/ssd-of-the-week-kingston-hyperx-savage/#comment-22225</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2015 20:02:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.thessdreview.com/?p=88942#comment-22225</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.thessdreview.com/daily-news/latest-buzz/ssd-of-the-week-kingston-hyperx-savage/#comment-22222&quot;&gt;Benjamin Hojnik&lt;/a&gt;.

Yes I too have noticed their insane floating BOM and what I meant to say was &quot;...and then whatever it was that showed up...&quot;.  A while back I spent some time perusing ssd.userbenchmark.com to see if I could discern any hidden bargains matching up the firmware with performance and decided that it was fools mission.  It&#039;s much less work just to buy from one of the many other companies that do not play games.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.thessdreview.com/daily-news/latest-buzz/ssd-of-the-week-kingston-hyperx-savage/#comment-22222">Benjamin Hojnik</a>.</p>
<p>Yes I too have noticed their insane floating BOM and what I meant to say was &#8220;&#8230;and then whatever it was that showed up&#8230;&#8221;.  A while back I spent some time perusing ssd.userbenchmark.com to see if I could discern any hidden bargains matching up the firmware with performance and decided that it was fools mission.  It&#8217;s much less work just to buy from one of the many other companies that do not play games.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Benjamin Hojnik		</title>
		<link>https://www.thessdreview.com/daily-news/latest-buzz/ssd-of-the-week-kingston-hyperx-savage/#comment-22222</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Benjamin Hojnik]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2015 15:36:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.thessdreview.com/?p=88942#comment-22222</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.thessdreview.com/daily-news/latest-buzz/ssd-of-the-week-kingston-hyperx-savage/#comment-22216&quot;&gt;Dan&lt;/a&gt;.

I&#039;m pretty sure V300 got another nand switch after the 20nm sync fiasko.

Because the last time i benched one of those 120GB puppies, it pulled ~4
460MB/s read and ~125MB/s write. No achievable on 20nm async.

Maybe 16nm micron async ?

Here is the proof
https://shrani.si/f/2n/10a/3buWxLUs/zajeta-slika.png]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.thessdreview.com/daily-news/latest-buzz/ssd-of-the-week-kingston-hyperx-savage/#comment-22216">Dan</a>.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m pretty sure V300 got another nand switch after the 20nm sync fiasko.</p>
<p>Because the last time i benched one of those 120GB puppies, it pulled ~4<br />
460MB/s read and ~125MB/s write. No achievable on 20nm async.</p>
<p>Maybe 16nm micron async ?</p>
<p>Here is the proof<br />
<a href="https://shrani.si/f/2n/10a/3buWxLUs/zajeta-slika.png" rel="nofollow ugc">https://shrani.si/f/2n/10a/3buWxLUs/zajeta-slika.png</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Dan		</title>
		<link>https://www.thessdreview.com/daily-news/latest-buzz/ssd-of-the-week-kingston-hyperx-savage/#comment-22216</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2015 22:08:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.thessdreview.com/?p=88942#comment-22216</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.thessdreview.com/daily-news/latest-buzz/ssd-of-the-week-kingston-hyperx-savage/#comment-22215&quot;&gt;Mike&lt;/a&gt;.

This guy does a decent job of tracking that type of info.

johnnylucky.org/data-storage/ssd-database.html

Understandably he is non-committal  about the V300 but I&#039;m pretty sure it was originally 19nm Toggle before the transition to the 20nm Micron Async or whatever it was that showed up on the Kingston loading dock.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.thessdreview.com/daily-news/latest-buzz/ssd-of-the-week-kingston-hyperx-savage/#comment-22215">Mike</a>.</p>
<p>This guy does a decent job of tracking that type of info.</p>
<p>johnnylucky.org/data-storage/ssd-database.html</p>
<p>Understandably he is non-committal  about the V300 but I&#8217;m pretty sure it was originally 19nm Toggle before the transition to the 20nm Micron Async or whatever it was that showed up on the Kingston loading dock.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Mike		</title>
		<link>https://www.thessdreview.com/daily-news/latest-buzz/ssd-of-the-week-kingston-hyperx-savage/#comment-22215</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mike]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2015 17:14:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.thessdreview.com/?p=88942#comment-22215</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Does anyone know the difference bettween the Toshiba nand used in the (hyperx savage, corsair neutron x, q series pro, and original ssdnow v300)?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does anyone know the difference bettween the Toshiba nand used in the (hyperx savage, corsair neutron x, q series pro, and original ssdnow v300)?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
