<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Silicon Motion Displays SM2246EN SSD Controller In The Wrong Light &#8211; Flash Memory Summit 2013 Update	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.thessdreview.com/daily-news/latest-buzz/silicon-motion-displays-sm2246e-ssd-controller-in-the-wrong-light/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.thessdreview.com/daily-news/latest-buzz/silicon-motion-displays-sm2246e-ssd-controller-in-the-wrong-light/</link>
	<description>The Worlds Dedicated SSD Education and Review Resource &#124;</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 19 Aug 2013 03:17:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Sean		</title>
		<link>https://www.thessdreview.com/daily-news/latest-buzz/silicon-motion-displays-sm2246e-ssd-controller-in-the-wrong-light/#comment-15998</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sean]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Aug 2013 03:17:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://thessdreview.com/?p=70728#comment-15998</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[They use a data length of 4MB on ATTO benchmark. That&#039;s way too small for a SSD. I think that would explain the poor result.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They use a data length of 4MB on ATTO benchmark. That&#8217;s way too small for a SSD. I think that would explain the poor result.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Les@TheSSDReview		</title>
		<link>https://www.thessdreview.com/daily-news/latest-buzz/silicon-motion-displays-sm2246e-ssd-controller-in-the-wrong-light/#comment-15987</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Les@TheSSDReview]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Aug 2013 02:52:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://thessdreview.com/?p=70728#comment-15987</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.thessdreview.com/daily-news/latest-buzz/silicon-motion-displays-sm2246e-ssd-controller-in-the-wrong-light/#comment-15986&quot;&gt;Anonomyous&lt;/a&gt;.

If you were referring to the benchmark results, I am only passing on what I was told by Silicon Motion.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.thessdreview.com/daily-news/latest-buzz/silicon-motion-displays-sm2246e-ssd-controller-in-the-wrong-light/#comment-15986">Anonomyous</a>.</p>
<p>If you were referring to the benchmark results, I am only passing on what I was told by Silicon Motion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Anonomyous		</title>
		<link>https://www.thessdreview.com/daily-news/latest-buzz/silicon-motion-displays-sm2246e-ssd-controller-in-the-wrong-light/#comment-15986</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonomyous]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Aug 2013 01:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://thessdreview.com/?p=70728#comment-15986</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[those are both TLC drives one is a 256gb and the other a 128GB]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>those are both TLC drives one is a 256gb and the other a 128GB</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Les@TheSSDReview		</title>
		<link>https://www.thessdreview.com/daily-news/latest-buzz/silicon-motion-displays-sm2246e-ssd-controller-in-the-wrong-light/#comment-15982</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Les@TheSSDReview]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Aug 2013 01:11:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://thessdreview.com/?p=70728#comment-15982</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.thessdreview.com/daily-news/latest-buzz/silicon-motion-displays-sm2246e-ssd-controller-in-the-wrong-light/#comment-15981&quot;&gt;Poster&lt;/a&gt;.

Great point.  ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.thessdreview.com/daily-news/latest-buzz/silicon-motion-displays-sm2246e-ssd-controller-in-the-wrong-light/#comment-15981">Poster</a>.</p>
<p>Great point.  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Poster		</title>
		<link>https://www.thessdreview.com/daily-news/latest-buzz/silicon-motion-displays-sm2246e-ssd-controller-in-the-wrong-light/#comment-15981</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Poster]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Aug 2013 01:07:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://thessdreview.com/?p=70728#comment-15981</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[They weren&#039;t shooting for performance by choosing TLC... They were shooting for consumer use and EXTREMELY low power.


TLC SSDs have so much capacity, that they will take forever for a consumer to program/erase the maximum number of program/erase cycles. Their goal was clearly to make a cheap ass SSD that took little power and could still run the normal everyday tasks of a consumer hard drive.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They weren&#8217;t shooting for performance by choosing TLC&#8230; They were shooting for consumer use and EXTREMELY low power.</p>
<p>TLC SSDs have so much capacity, that they will take forever for a consumer to program/erase the maximum number of program/erase cycles. Their goal was clearly to make a cheap ass SSD that took little power and could still run the normal everyday tasks of a consumer hard drive.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
