<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Samsung Begins Mass Producing 128GBPS MLC NAND Chips Using Sub-20 nm Architecture	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.thessdreview.com/daily-news/latest-buzz/samsung-begins-mass-producing-128gb-mlc-nand-chips-using-sub-20-nm-architecture/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.thessdreview.com/daily-news/latest-buzz/samsung-begins-mass-producing-128gb-mlc-nand-chips-using-sub-20-nm-architecture/</link>
	<description>The Worlds Dedicated SSD Education and Review Resource &#124;</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Apr 2013 20:54:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: reliable_info_is_precise		</title>
		<link>https://www.thessdreview.com/daily-news/latest-buzz/samsung-begins-mass-producing-128gb-mlc-nand-chips-using-sub-20-nm-architecture/#comment-15353</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[reliable_info_is_precise]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Apr 2013 20:54:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://thessdreview.com/?p=65721#comment-15353</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.thessdreview.com/daily-news/latest-buzz/samsung-begins-mass-producing-128gb-mlc-nand-chips-using-sub-20-nm-architecture/#comment-15262&quot;&gt;AntonAM&lt;/a&gt;.

I&#039;m with you on this one, Anton!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.thessdreview.com/daily-news/latest-buzz/samsung-begins-mass-producing-128gb-mlc-nand-chips-using-sub-20-nm-architecture/#comment-15262">AntonAM</a>.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m with you on this one, Anton!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Les@TheSSDReview		</title>
		<link>https://www.thessdreview.com/daily-news/latest-buzz/samsung-begins-mass-producing-128gb-mlc-nand-chips-using-sub-20-nm-architecture/#comment-15263</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Les@TheSSDReview]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Apr 2013 20:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://thessdreview.com/?p=65721#comment-15263</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.thessdreview.com/daily-news/latest-buzz/samsung-begins-mass-producing-128gb-mlc-nand-chips-using-sub-20-nm-architecture/#comment-15262&quot;&gt;AntonAM&lt;/a&gt;.

Title is fine and thanks for the 128GB Anton.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.thessdreview.com/daily-news/latest-buzz/samsung-begins-mass-producing-128gb-mlc-nand-chips-using-sub-20-nm-architecture/#comment-15262">AntonAM</a>.</p>
<p>Title is fine and thanks for the 128GB Anton.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: AntonAM		</title>
		<link>https://www.thessdreview.com/daily-news/latest-buzz/samsung-begins-mass-producing-128gb-mlc-nand-chips-using-sub-20-nm-architecture/#comment-15262</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[AntonAM]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Apr 2013 15:48:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://thessdreview.com/?p=65721#comment-15262</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.thessdreview.com/daily-news/latest-buzz/samsung-begins-mass-producing-128gb-mlc-nand-chips-using-sub-20-nm-architecture/#comment-15255&quot;&gt;Les@TheSSDReview&lt;/a&gt;.

I don&#039;t want to be some sort of abbreviation nazi, but I think news site of TSSDR caliber should be accurate. Heading is still wrong :)
Gbps = gigabits per second, and seconds have nothing to do here. There&#039;s also wrong &quot;128GB&quot; (must be &quot;128Gb&quot;) all over the post&#039;s text. Since all letters in the title must be uppercase, I suggest this:

&quot;SAMSUNG BEGINS MASS PRODUCTION OF 128-GIGABIT MLC NAND CHIPS USING SUB-20 NM ARCHITECTURE&quot;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.thessdreview.com/daily-news/latest-buzz/samsung-begins-mass-producing-128gb-mlc-nand-chips-using-sub-20-nm-architecture/#comment-15255">Les@TheSSDReview</a>.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t want to be some sort of abbreviation nazi, but I think news site of TSSDR caliber should be accurate. Heading is still wrong 🙂<br />
Gbps = gigabits per second, and seconds have nothing to do here. There&#8217;s also wrong &#8220;128GB&#8221; (must be &#8220;128Gb&#8221;) all over the post&#8217;s text. Since all letters in the title must be uppercase, I suggest this:</p>
<p>&#8220;SAMSUNG BEGINS MASS PRODUCTION OF 128-GIGABIT MLC NAND CHIPS USING SUB-20 NM ARCHITECTURE&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Les@TheSSDReview		</title>
		<link>https://www.thessdreview.com/daily-news/latest-buzz/samsung-begins-mass-producing-128gb-mlc-nand-chips-using-sub-20-nm-architecture/#comment-15255</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Les@TheSSDReview]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Apr 2013 15:39:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://thessdreview.com/?p=65721#comment-15255</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.thessdreview.com/daily-news/latest-buzz/samsung-begins-mass-producing-128gb-mlc-nand-chips-using-sub-20-nm-architecture/#comment-15252&quot;&gt;AntonAM&lt;/a&gt;.

Doooh...Corrected tx!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.thessdreview.com/daily-news/latest-buzz/samsung-begins-mass-producing-128gb-mlc-nand-chips-using-sub-20-nm-architecture/#comment-15252">AntonAM</a>.</p>
<p>Doooh&#8230;Corrected tx!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: AntonAM		</title>
		<link>https://www.thessdreview.com/daily-news/latest-buzz/samsung-begins-mass-producing-128gb-mlc-nand-chips-using-sub-20-nm-architecture/#comment-15252</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[AntonAM]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Apr 2013 09:43:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://thessdreview.com/?p=65721#comment-15252</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[You&#039;re using abbreviation GB wrong. Samsung announced 128-gigabit module, not 128-gigabyte.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re using abbreviation GB wrong. Samsung announced 128-gigabit module, not 128-gigabyte.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
