<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: OCZ Officially Names Vertex 4 and OCZ Enterprise is Booming &#8211; CeBIT 2012 Update	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.thessdreview.com/daily-news/latest-buzz/ocz-officially-names-vertex-4-and-ocz-enterprise-is-booming-cebit-2012-update/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.thessdreview.com/daily-news/latest-buzz/ocz-officially-names-vertex-4-and-ocz-enterprise-is-booming-cebit-2012-update/</link>
	<description>The Worlds Dedicated SSD Education and Review Resource &#124;</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 Apr 2012 18:03:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Chook		</title>
		<link>https://www.thessdreview.com/daily-news/latest-buzz/ocz-officially-names-vertex-4-and-ocz-enterprise-is-booming-cebit-2012-update/#comment-9691</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chook]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Mar 2012 21:39:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://thessdreview.com/?p=43238#comment-9691</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[She&#039;s Hot!  but Im guessing this comment will be removed because Im stating whats really hot here :p]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>She&#8217;s Hot!  but Im guessing this comment will be removed because Im stating whats really hot here :p</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Neuromancer		</title>
		<link>https://www.thessdreview.com/daily-news/latest-buzz/ocz-officially-names-vertex-4-and-ocz-enterprise-is-booming-cebit-2012-update/#comment-9673</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Neuromancer]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Mar 2012 15:52:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://thessdreview.com/?p=43238#comment-9673</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.thessdreview.com/daily-news/latest-buzz/ocz-officially-names-vertex-4-and-ocz-enterprise-is-booming-cebit-2012-update/#comment-9600&quot;&gt;dravo1&lt;/a&gt;.

It&#039;s called RAISE (Redundant Array of Independent Silicon Elements) and it is already done in ALL SSDs. the reason being is that the fastest commercially available NAND chips right now are only capable of 166 MT/s IIRC (Maybe 200?). Next year toggle 2 (400 MT/s) NAND should be available. 

SSD controllers are like RAID controllers in that they come with number of available channels (sandforce = 8) so 8 NAND cells can be &quot;striped&quot; together. To saturate the BUS. As density and speed increase we see faster chips being raided together or additional controllers being tossed into the mix to create more channels. Blowing well past the SATA 6Gbps standard and necessitating PCIExpress slots.

]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.thessdreview.com/daily-news/latest-buzz/ocz-officially-names-vertex-4-and-ocz-enterprise-is-booming-cebit-2012-update/#comment-9600">dravo1</a>.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s called RAISE (Redundant Array of Independent Silicon Elements) and it is already done in ALL SSDs. the reason being is that the fastest commercially available NAND chips right now are only capable of 166 MT/s IIRC (Maybe 200?). Next year toggle 2 (400 MT/s) NAND should be available. </p>
<p>SSD controllers are like RAID controllers in that they come with number of available channels (sandforce = 8) so 8 NAND cells can be &#8220;striped&#8221; together. To saturate the BUS. As density and speed increase we see faster chips being raided together or additional controllers being tossed into the mix to create more channels. Blowing well past the SATA 6Gbps standard and necessitating PCIExpress slots.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Zaxx		</title>
		<link>https://www.thessdreview.com/daily-news/latest-buzz/ocz-officially-names-vertex-4-and-ocz-enterprise-is-booming-cebit-2012-update/#comment-9614</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zaxx]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2012 04:28:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://thessdreview.com/?p=43238#comment-9614</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Just noticed the IDE mode too....bet they did it on purpose to keep people guessing the full potential...I hope, lol.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just noticed the IDE mode too&#8230;.bet they did it on purpose to keep people guessing the full potential&#8230;I hope, lol.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: MRFS		</title>
		<link>https://www.thessdreview.com/daily-news/latest-buzz/ocz-officially-names-vertex-4-and-ocz-enterprise-is-booming-cebit-2012-update/#comment-9609</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[MRFS]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2012 23:37:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://thessdreview.com/?p=43238#comment-9609</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.thessdreview.com/daily-news/latest-buzz/ocz-officially-names-vertex-4-and-ocz-enterprise-is-booming-cebit-2012-update/#comment-9600&quot;&gt;dravo1&lt;/a&gt;.

Not necessarily RAID striping.

A few months back, we proposed a &quot;SATA-IV&quot; standard which ups the clock rate to 8G and adopts the 128b/130b &quot;jumbo frame&quot; now in the PCI-E 3.0 specification:  

8G / 8 bits per byte = 1.0 GBps.

I don&#039;t know if this is what they are planning, however;  and, obviously, this requires upgrades to the controllers at both ends of the data cable.

Nevertheless, as we explained in a Thread posted in this Forum, this is a very logical extension of the PCI-E 3.0 &quot;topology&quot; -- using flexible cables to supplement the hard-wired traces on motherboard layers:

https://www.thessdreview.com/Forums/ssd-discussion/1555.htm


MRFS
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.thessdreview.com/daily-news/latest-buzz/ocz-officially-names-vertex-4-and-ocz-enterprise-is-booming-cebit-2012-update/#comment-9600">dravo1</a>.</p>
<p>Not necessarily RAID striping.</p>
<p>A few months back, we proposed a &#8220;SATA-IV&#8221; standard which ups the clock rate to 8G and adopts the 128b/130b &#8220;jumbo frame&#8221; now in the PCI-E 3.0 specification:  </p>
<p>8G / 8 bits per byte = 1.0 GBps.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t know if this is what they are planning, however;  and, obviously, this requires upgrades to the controllers at both ends of the data cable.</p>
<p>Nevertheless, as we explained in a Thread posted in this Forum, this is a very logical extension of the PCI-E 3.0 &#8220;topology&#8221; &#8212; using flexible cables to supplement the hard-wired traces on motherboard layers:</p>
<p><a href="https://www.thessdreview.com/Forums/ssd-discussion/1555.htm" rel="ugc">https://www.thessdreview.com/Forums/ssd-discussion/1555.htm</a></p>
<p>MRFS</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Jon Coulter		</title>
		<link>https://www.thessdreview.com/daily-news/latest-buzz/ocz-officially-names-vertex-4-and-ocz-enterprise-is-booming-cebit-2012-update/#comment-9608</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jon Coulter]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2012 22:24:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://thessdreview.com/?p=43238#comment-9608</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[maybe if they removed their heads from their........... and weren&#039;t running it in IDE MODE we would see better performance........ HELLO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>maybe if they removed their heads from their&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;.. and weren&#8217;t running it in IDE MODE we would see better performance&#8230;&#8230;.. HELLO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
