<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: OCZ Announces Intrepid 3000 Series of Enterprise SSDs &#8212; Superior Sustained IOPS and Low Latency	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.thessdreview.com/daily-news/latest-buzz/ocz-announces-intrepid-3000-series-enterprise-ssds-superior-sustained-iops-low-latency/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.thessdreview.com/daily-news/latest-buzz/ocz-announces-intrepid-3000-series-enterprise-ssds-superior-sustained-iops-low-latency/</link>
	<description>The Worlds Dedicated SSD Education and Review Resource &#124;</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 Dec 2013 14:18:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Les@TheSSDReview		</title>
		<link>https://www.thessdreview.com/daily-news/latest-buzz/ocz-announces-intrepid-3000-series-enterprise-ssds-superior-sustained-iops-low-latency/#comment-16884</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Les@TheSSDReview]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Dec 2013 14:18:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.thessdreview.com/?p=75489#comment-16884</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.thessdreview.com/daily-news/latest-buzz/ocz-announces-intrepid-3000-series-enterprise-ssds-superior-sustained-iops-low-latency/#comment-16883&quot;&gt;bartium&lt;/a&gt;.

I don&#039;t think, when all is said and done, Toshiba will be getting rid of the OCZ anytime soon, just as LSI hasn&#039;t with SandForce.  I think that, what we may see, is Toshiba and OCZ playing the competing role with the same controller...similar to what we see in GMC/Chevrolet.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.thessdreview.com/daily-news/latest-buzz/ocz-announces-intrepid-3000-series-enterprise-ssds-superior-sustained-iops-low-latency/#comment-16883">bartium</a>.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think, when all is said and done, Toshiba will be getting rid of the OCZ anytime soon, just as LSI hasn&#8217;t with SandForce.  I think that, what we may see, is Toshiba and OCZ playing the competing role with the same controller&#8230;similar to what we see in GMC/Chevrolet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: bartium		</title>
		<link>https://www.thessdreview.com/daily-news/latest-buzz/ocz-announces-intrepid-3000-series-enterprise-ssds-superior-sustained-iops-low-latency/#comment-16883</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[bartium]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Dec 2013 14:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.thessdreview.com/?p=75489#comment-16883</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[OCZ? Don&#039;t you mean Toshiba?  :) ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OCZ? Don&#8217;t you mean Toshiba?  🙂 </p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
