Comments on: Marvell’s New 88NV1120 Pictures Display Ultra Small Controller – Storage Visions 2015 Update

By: Okc Dave

Okc Dave — Sun, 21 Aug 2016 20:30:00 +0000

ok, wow small, and not-so-wow, sacrificing performance. I think DRAM-less is not a good thing, not when storage subsystem performance is so integral to a good user experience and the volume of our data keeps expanding.

I know this review is now two years old, but now we see this controller out in the wild, underwhelming with it’s performance. Certainly it does good for the size and cost, but what’s a small size and cost increase relative to the larger product it’s integrated in?

Gentlemen, let’s not go backwards in performance in an effort trying to make products too small to use. Usability is going to distinguish mobile products in the future even more than it does today.

By: johannes andersson

johannes andersson — Wed, 07 Jan 2015 10:04:00 +0000

Woah!

By: Les@TheSSDReview

Les@TheSSDReview — Mon, 05 Jan 2015 23:49:00 +0000

In reply to Dean Dayton Rogers. Thank you for that...

By: Dean Dayton Rogers

Dean Dayton Rogers — Mon, 05 Jan 2015 21:41:00 +0000

Wow, this is really fascinating ! By the way , on the second paragraph underneath the first picture you wrote ” the entire SSD being almost exactly the size of an SSD card” ….I think you meant : the entire SSD being almost exactly the size of an SD card….