<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: LSI Introduces SandForce SF3700 Flash Controller Capable Of 1,800MB/s Sequential Reads, First To Support Two Native Host Interfaces	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.thessdreview.com/daily-news/latest-buzz/lsi-introduces-sandforce-sf3700-flash-controller-capable-1800mbs-sequential-reads-first-support-two-native-host-interfaces/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.thessdreview.com/daily-news/latest-buzz/lsi-introduces-sandforce-sf3700-flash-controller-capable-1800mbs-sequential-reads-first-support-two-native-host-interfaces/</link>
	<description>The Worlds Dedicated SSD Education and Review Resource &#124;</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 18 Nov 2013 16:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: billegge		</title>
		<link>https://www.thessdreview.com/daily-news/latest-buzz/lsi-introduces-sandforce-sf3700-flash-controller-capable-1800mbs-sequential-reads-first-support-two-native-host-interfaces/#comment-16673</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[billegge]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Nov 2013 16:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.thessdreview.com/?p=74445#comment-16673</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Sandforce fakes their throughput using compression on highly compressable (all zero&#039;s) data.  So basically you don&#039;t see the controller working but instead just see the BUS throughput.  I would be interested in benchmarks using un-compressed data, and also sequential reads are pointless because the real world is small random reads in parallel as well as small writes.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sandforce fakes their throughput using compression on highly compressable (all zero&#8217;s) data.  So basically you don&#8217;t see the controller working but instead just see the BUS throughput.  I would be interested in benchmarks using un-compressed data, and also sequential reads are pointless because the real world is small random reads in parallel as well as small writes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
