<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: LSI Durawrite Virtual Capacity Increases SSD Capacity By Up To 3x &#8211; Flash Memory Summit 2013 Update	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.thessdreview.com/daily-news/latest-buzz/lsi-durawrite-virtual-capacity-increses-ssd-capacity-by-up-to-3x-flash-memory-summit-2013-update/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.thessdreview.com/daily-news/latest-buzz/lsi-durawrite-virtual-capacity-increses-ssd-capacity-by-up-to-3x-flash-memory-summit-2013-update/</link>
	<description>The Worlds Dedicated SSD Education and Review Resource &#124;</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Aug 2013 16:37:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Les@TheSSDReview		</title>
		<link>https://www.thessdreview.com/daily-news/latest-buzz/lsi-durawrite-virtual-capacity-increses-ssd-capacity-by-up-to-3x-flash-memory-summit-2013-update/#comment-15972</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Les@TheSSDReview]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Aug 2013 16:37:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://thessdreview.com/?p=70688#comment-15972</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.thessdreview.com/daily-news/latest-buzz/lsi-durawrite-virtual-capacity-increses-ssd-capacity-by-up-to-3x-flash-memory-summit-2013-update/#comment-15970&quot;&gt;Consumer&lt;/a&gt;.

Notice the SSD in use...not your average run of the mill package.  When I spoke with the team, they stuck to the fact that this is specifically geared towards hyperscale datacenters and cloud computing specifically because of the workloads.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.thessdreview.com/daily-news/latest-buzz/lsi-durawrite-virtual-capacity-increses-ssd-capacity-by-up-to-3x-flash-memory-summit-2013-update/#comment-15970">Consumer</a>.</p>
<p>Notice the SSD in use&#8230;not your average run of the mill package.  When I spoke with the team, they stuck to the fact that this is specifically geared towards hyperscale datacenters and cloud computing specifically because of the workloads.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Consumer		</title>
		<link>https://www.thessdreview.com/daily-news/latest-buzz/lsi-durawrite-virtual-capacity-increses-ssd-capacity-by-up-to-3x-flash-memory-summit-2013-update/#comment-15970</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Consumer]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Aug 2013 16:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://thessdreview.com/?p=70688#comment-15970</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I wish LSI would release this for consumer SSDs too. This is the kind of stuff we need increase competition.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wish LSI would release this for consumer SSDs too. This is the kind of stuff we need increase competition.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: J		</title>
		<link>https://www.thessdreview.com/daily-news/latest-buzz/lsi-durawrite-virtual-capacity-increses-ssd-capacity-by-up-to-3x-flash-memory-summit-2013-update/#comment-15968</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[J]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Aug 2013 16:07:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://thessdreview.com/?p=70688#comment-15968</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.thessdreview.com/daily-news/latest-buzz/lsi-durawrite-virtual-capacity-increses-ssd-capacity-by-up-to-3x-flash-memory-summit-2013-update/#comment-15956&quot;&gt;Zaxx&lt;/a&gt;.

Capacitors likely. They look polarized. SSDs need cap banks for power holdup, so they can dump the tables during a loss of power


Plus decoupling and other uses]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.thessdreview.com/daily-news/latest-buzz/lsi-durawrite-virtual-capacity-increses-ssd-capacity-by-up-to-3x-flash-memory-summit-2013-update/#comment-15956">Zaxx</a>.</p>
<p>Capacitors likely. They look polarized. SSDs need cap banks for power holdup, so they can dump the tables during a loss of power</p>
<p>Plus decoupling and other uses</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Zaxx		</title>
		<link>https://www.thessdreview.com/daily-news/latest-buzz/lsi-durawrite-virtual-capacity-increses-ssd-capacity-by-up-to-3x-flash-memory-summit-2013-update/#comment-15956</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zaxx]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Aug 2013 01:07:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://thessdreview.com/?p=70688#comment-15956</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Interesting but I guessing there wouldn&#039;t be near as much room with incompressible data such as video . Ofc data centers probably don&#039;t handle much video. What are all the little black components at the top of the PCB? 

Still can&#039;t believe the SF-3000 was a no-show...bummer.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting but I guessing there wouldn&#8217;t be near as much room with incompressible data such as video . Ofc data centers probably don&#8217;t handle much video. What are all the little black components at the top of the PCB? </p>
<p>Still can&#8217;t believe the SF-3000 was a no-show&#8230;bummer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
