Comments on: iPhone 6S Uses NVMe Storage – Performance Determined By Capacity

By: Avieshek Rajkhowa

Avieshek Rajkhowa — Wed, 19 Oct 2016 13:39:00 +0000

*Can’t read the comments.

Which is better as the future of mobile storage, UFS or NVMe?

By: tipoo2

tipoo2 — Mon, 15 Aug 2016 18:58:00 +0000

1800MB/s? Big B? That doesn’t line up with anandtechs tests (~400-500MB/s iirc) and would make it faster than their Macbook Pros…That seems off. It’s still the fastest phone storage out there but that graph is odd. Even the 16GB is faster than other sites tests of the 64GB.

I don’t think Passmarks scores translate into MB/s, that’s the issue.

By: Mike

Mike — Thu, 25 Feb 2016 02:18:00 +0000

In reply to Les@TheSSDReview.

Apple also multi-source components. If you look at iFixit iPhone 6s teardown, it’s a Toshiba THGBX5G7D2KLFXG 16 GB 19 nm NAND Flash:

https://www.ifixit.com/Teardown/iPhone+6s+Teardown/48170

By: Alexandru Maran

Alexandru Maran — Wed, 28 Oct 2015 17:54:00 +0000

Something: why isnt apple putting uSB 3 on these?

By: Les@TheSSDReview

Les@TheSSDReview — Tue, 06 Oct 2015 12:56:00 +0000

In reply to HERETIC. I definitely agree that premium merchandise comes with a premium price; the cost of this phone here after taxes with the protection plan and case would be just under $1800 w/o contract. It still goes to say, however, that their use of a premium Toshiba (or there partner Samsung's) mlc 128GB chip would have driven the cost up significantly.