<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Intel Announces Pro2500 Series of Self-Encrypting SSDs For Business	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.thessdreview.com/daily-news/latest-buzz/intel-announces-pro2500-series-self-encrypting-ssds-business/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.thessdreview.com/daily-news/latest-buzz/intel-announces-pro2500-series-self-encrypting-ssds-business/</link>
	<description>The Worlds Dedicated SSD Education and Review Resource &#124;</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2014 14:39:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Daniel		</title>
		<link>https://www.thessdreview.com/daily-news/latest-buzz/intel-announces-pro2500-series-self-encrypting-ssds-business/#comment-19896</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Daniel]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2014 14:39:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.thessdreview.com/?p=81158#comment-19896</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.thessdreview.com/daily-news/latest-buzz/intel-announces-pro2500-series-self-encrypting-ssds-business/#comment-19889&quot;&gt;Mike&lt;/a&gt;.

1) Intel&#039;s &quot;real&quot; enterprise SSD (DC P3700 ...)  pricing is highly competitive (you really get value for the money), in contrast to their Xeon CPU pricing - caused by higher competition in SSD market


2) These Professional/SmallBusiness 730 SSDs are not aimed, but suitable for 24/7 server workloads - they have a very high performance consistency compared to the Samsung/SanDisk Prosumer Drives (840 Pro, Extreme)


View last graph on this Anandtech review
 - https://www.anandtech.com/show/7803/intel-ssd-730-480gb-review/2


They have about 1.7 higher performance consistency so they are better. 

I doubt, if this is really usefull for a prosumer. As long as you aren&#039;t running &quot;half serious&quot; big data applications 24/7 - there is no use case i can image. (For serious big data, you will buy solutions from your vendor, or at least use pcie) 



Maybe there is some use case for high-performace RAID Storage, but you would need 10Gb LAN. The latency and endurance

are on par with the Samsung 840 (RAPID enabled).



So you are right, they aren&#039;t price competitive in the consumer/small business market, because you pay for this consisitency/lwo latency feature, that nobody realy needs. 



Anybody knows other use cases?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.thessdreview.com/daily-news/latest-buzz/intel-announces-pro2500-series-self-encrypting-ssds-business/#comment-19889">Mike</a>.</p>
<p>1) Intel&#8217;s &#8220;real&#8221; enterprise SSD (DC P3700 &#8230;)  pricing is highly competitive (you really get value for the money), in contrast to their Xeon CPU pricing &#8211; caused by higher competition in SSD market</p>
<p>2) These Professional/SmallBusiness 730 SSDs are not aimed, but suitable for 24/7 server workloads &#8211; they have a very high performance consistency compared to the Samsung/SanDisk Prosumer Drives (840 Pro, Extreme)</p>
<p>View last graph on this Anandtech review<br />
 &#8211; <a href="https://www.anandtech.com/show/7803/intel-ssd-730-480gb-review/2" rel="nofollow ugc">https://www.anandtech.com/show/7803/intel-ssd-730-480gb-review/2</a></p>
<p>They have about 1.7 higher performance consistency so they are better. </p>
<p>I doubt, if this is really usefull for a prosumer. As long as you aren&#8217;t running &#8220;half serious&#8221; big data applications 24/7 &#8211; there is no use case i can image. (For serious big data, you will buy solutions from your vendor, or at least use pcie) </p>
<p>Maybe there is some use case for high-performace RAID Storage, but you would need 10Gb LAN. The latency and endurance</p>
<p>are on par with the Samsung 840 (RAPID enabled).</p>
<p>So you are right, they aren&#8217;t price competitive in the consumer/small business market, because you pay for this consisitency/lwo latency feature, that nobody realy needs. </p>
<p>Anybody knows other use cases?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Les@TheSSDReview		</title>
		<link>https://www.thessdreview.com/daily-news/latest-buzz/intel-announces-pro2500-series-self-encrypting-ssds-business/#comment-19895</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Les@TheSSDReview]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2014 11:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.thessdreview.com/?p=81158#comment-19895</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.thessdreview.com/daily-news/latest-buzz/intel-announces-pro2500-series-self-encrypting-ssds-business/#comment-19889&quot;&gt;Mike&lt;/a&gt;.

The demand has nothing to do whatsoever with consumer sales as they are such a small part of the entire flash picture.  This is an interesting announcement by Intel, however, and does bring forward a few thoughts, these including validating the reality of a shortage in flash, or simply, flash can be obtained from outside sources cheaper than they themselves are making. WE have seen tyhis in Samsung with SSD controllers where they have used outside sources, rather than there own, simply because their contract commitments had better dividends than using the controllers in their own products.... Series 9 Ultra.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.thessdreview.com/daily-news/latest-buzz/intel-announces-pro2500-series-self-encrypting-ssds-business/#comment-19889">Mike</a>.</p>
<p>The demand has nothing to do whatsoever with consumer sales as they are such a small part of the entire flash picture.  This is an interesting announcement by Intel, however, and does bring forward a few thoughts, these including validating the reality of a shortage in flash, or simply, flash can be obtained from outside sources cheaper than they themselves are making. WE have seen tyhis in Samsung with SSD controllers where they have used outside sources, rather than there own, simply because their contract commitments had better dividends than using the controllers in their own products&#8230;. Series 9 Ultra.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Mike		</title>
		<link>https://www.thessdreview.com/daily-news/latest-buzz/intel-announces-pro2500-series-self-encrypting-ssds-business/#comment-19889</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mike]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2014 03:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.thessdreview.com/?p=81158#comment-19889</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.thessdreview.com/daily-news/latest-buzz/intel-announces-pro2500-series-self-encrypting-ssds-business/#comment-19887&quot;&gt;renosablast&lt;/a&gt;.

Is There really so much of a demand?
 I&#039;m guessing Neweg is one of the biggest ssd sellers and the Intel drives don&#039;t have many reviews compared to 1.Samsung 2. muskin 3. crucial 4. corsair 5. Kingston.  On &#038; On down the line. I can&#039;t understand there pricing it doesn&#039;t seem competitive.

The 335 got better reviews than the newer 530 the 730 seems
way overpriced. Does Intel want to sell to consumers or just business.
The 520 was at the top of the charts and the newer ssds seem
there not as good as there competition or their way overpriced. SSD prices should be around  240gb = $100.00     480gb = $200.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.thessdreview.com/daily-news/latest-buzz/intel-announces-pro2500-series-self-encrypting-ssds-business/#comment-19887">renosablast</a>.</p>
<p>Is There really so much of a demand?<br />
 I&#8217;m guessing Neweg is one of the biggest ssd sellers and the Intel drives don&#8217;t have many reviews compared to 1.Samsung 2. muskin 3. crucial 4. corsair 5. Kingston.  On &amp; On down the line. I can&#8217;t understand there pricing it doesn&#8217;t seem competitive.</p>
<p>The 335 got better reviews than the newer 530 the 730 seems<br />
way overpriced. Does Intel want to sell to consumers or just business.<br />
The 520 was at the top of the charts and the newer ssds seem<br />
there not as good as there competition or their way overpriced. SSD prices should be around  240gb = $100.00     480gb = $200.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: renosablast		</title>
		<link>https://www.thessdreview.com/daily-news/latest-buzz/intel-announces-pro2500-series-self-encrypting-ssds-business/#comment-19887</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[renosablast]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2014 21:26:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.thessdreview.com/?p=81158#comment-19887</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.thessdreview.com/daily-news/latest-buzz/intel-announces-pro2500-series-self-encrypting-ssds-business/#comment-19881&quot;&gt;Mike&lt;/a&gt;.

When demand exceeds capacity, a Plan B is in order.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.thessdreview.com/daily-news/latest-buzz/intel-announces-pro2500-series-self-encrypting-ssds-business/#comment-19881">Mike</a>.</p>
<p>When demand exceeds capacity, a Plan B is in order.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Mike		</title>
		<link>https://www.thessdreview.com/daily-news/latest-buzz/intel-announces-pro2500-series-self-encrypting-ssds-business/#comment-19881</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mike]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2014 01:16:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.thessdreview.com/?p=81158#comment-19881</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&quot; Intel has also recently expanded its NAND sourcing &quot; I thought Intel made their own nand
crucial / micron. Why would they need or use nand from SK
Hynix ?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8221; Intel has also recently expanded its NAND sourcing &#8221; I thought Intel made their own nand<br />
crucial / micron. Why would they need or use nand from SK<br />
Hynix ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
