<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Crucial C300 SSD Firmware Update 006 Release For Better Performance	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.thessdreview.com/daily-news/latest-buzz/crucial-c300-ssd-firmware-update-006-released-for-better-performance/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.thessdreview.com/daily-news/latest-buzz/crucial-c300-ssd-firmware-update-006-released-for-better-performance/</link>
	<description>The Worlds Dedicated SSD Education and Review Resource &#124;</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 27 Nov 2010 05:21:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Chris		</title>
		<link>https://www.thessdreview.com/daily-news/latest-buzz/crucial-c300-ssd-firmware-update-006-released-for-better-performance/#comment-2880</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Nov 2010 05:21:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://thessdreview.com/?p=5873#comment-2880</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[So according to the article there is supposed to be a review later in the week, but the weeks already over and I don&#039;t see any Review...

EDIT:  You are absolutely right and, unfortunately, things have been a bit overwhelming at the site with all the new attention lately.  We did state that we would test for an increase in performance, not review, and we did with no appreciable difference observed.  Apologies for not posting it.  This is still an amazing drive!!!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So according to the article there is supposed to be a review later in the week, but the weeks already over and I don&#8217;t see any Review&#8230;</p>
<p>EDIT:  You are absolutely right and, unfortunately, things have been a bit overwhelming at the site with all the new attention lately.  We did state that we would test for an increase in performance, not review, and we did with no appreciable difference observed.  Apologies for not posting it.  This is still an amazing drive!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: hrabiamol		</title>
		<link>https://www.thessdreview.com/daily-news/latest-buzz/crucial-c300-ssd-firmware-update-006-released-for-better-performance/#comment-2663</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[hrabiamol]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Nov 2010 15:49:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://thessdreview.com/?p=5873#comment-2663</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I just upgraded it. It went smooth in my laptop (lenovo T500)]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just upgraded it. It went smooth in my laptop (lenovo T500)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Fred		</title>
		<link>https://www.thessdreview.com/daily-news/latest-buzz/crucial-c300-ssd-firmware-update-006-released-for-better-performance/#comment-2639</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Fred]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Nov 2010 06:38:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://thessdreview.com/?p=5873#comment-2639</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I just updated a C300 256 GB from version 002 to version 006. It is a non destructive upgrade. I use this drive in a Dell E6410. I could not perform the upgrade from the laptop, I had to put it in a desktop computer with IDE settings in the BIOS. The upgrade went smooth after that - no problems.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just updated a C300 256 GB from version 002 to version 006. It is a non destructive upgrade. I use this drive in a Dell E6410. I could not perform the upgrade from the laptop, I had to put it in a desktop computer with IDE settings in the BIOS. The upgrade went smooth after that &#8211; no problems.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Daniel		</title>
		<link>https://www.thessdreview.com/daily-news/latest-buzz/crucial-c300-ssd-firmware-update-006-released-for-better-performance/#comment-2632</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Daniel]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Nov 2010 00:49:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://thessdreview.com/?p=5873#comment-2632</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[This Crucial C300 256Go firmware 0006 Update is it compatible with Mac OS X 10.6 Snow Leopard?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This Crucial C300 256Go firmware 0006 Update is it compatible with Mac OS X 10.6 Snow Leopard?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: poohbear		</title>
		<link>https://www.thessdreview.com/daily-news/latest-buzz/crucial-c300-ssd-firmware-update-006-released-for-better-performance/#comment-2612</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[poohbear]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Nov 2010 15:59:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://thessdreview.com/?p=5873#comment-2612</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[thanks for the update Les!  Any word on if the C300 64gb is getting this firmware update too? Is this a destructive firmware, meaning everything will be wiped clean?  thanks in advance!

REPLY:  It is not a data destructive upgrade according to the release flyer and I cannot answer with respect to the 64GB except to say, I only learned that it was not compatible with the 64GB SSDs after trying on the two that I have presently.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thanks for the update Les!  Any word on if the C300 64gb is getting this firmware update too? Is this a destructive firmware, meaning everything will be wiped clean?  thanks in advance!</p>
<p>REPLY:  It is not a data destructive upgrade according to the release flyer and I cannot answer with respect to the 64GB except to say, I only learned that it was not compatible with the 64GB SSDs after trying on the two that I have presently.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
