<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Mushkin Unveils ECO3 SSD &#038; New USB Drives &#8211; CES 2016 Update	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.thessdreview.com/ces-2016/mushkin-ces-2016-update/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.thessdreview.com/ces-2016/mushkin-ces-2016-update/</link>
	<description>The Worlds Dedicated SSD Education and Review Resource &#124;</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2016 20:13:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Scour		</title>
		<link>https://www.thessdreview.com/ces-2016/mushkin-ces-2016-update/#comment-22963</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Scour]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2016 20:13:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.thessdreview.com/?p=90837#comment-22963</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.thessdreview.com/ces-2016/mushkin-ces-2016-update/#comment-22949&quot;&gt;CBarr&lt;/a&gt;.

SD-cards have more often TLC ;)


If Mushkin uses Micron-MLC itcan´t be that bad, I guess]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.thessdreview.com/ces-2016/mushkin-ces-2016-update/#comment-22949">CBarr</a>.</p>
<p>SD-cards have more often TLC 😉</p>
<p>If Mushkin uses Micron-MLC itcan´t be that bad, I guess</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: CBarr		</title>
		<link>https://www.thessdreview.com/ces-2016/mushkin-ces-2016-update/#comment-22949</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CBarr]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2016 19:03:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.thessdreview.com/?p=90837#comment-22949</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.thessdreview.com/ces-2016/mushkin-ces-2016-update/#comment-22948&quot;&gt;Scour&lt;/a&gt;.

Yeah maybe it might also be slightly lower quality chips as they do by it in wafer format so they verify what chips go where ie lower quality would be sd cards and such. I wonder why mushkin doesn&#039;t have it on its website though strange.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.thessdreview.com/ces-2016/mushkin-ces-2016-update/#comment-22948">Scour</a>.</p>
<p>Yeah maybe it might also be slightly lower quality chips as they do by it in wafer format so they verify what chips go where ie lower quality would be sd cards and such. I wonder why mushkin doesn&#8217;t have it on its website though strange.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Scour		</title>
		<link>https://www.thessdreview.com/ces-2016/mushkin-ces-2016-update/#comment-22948</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Scour]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2016 18:58:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.thessdreview.com/?p=90837#comment-22948</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.thessdreview.com/ces-2016/mushkin-ces-2016-update/#comment-22946&quot;&gt;CBarr&lt;/a&gt;.

The LT seems to be new. It is listed in Germany since end of january 2016.

The controller is identical. I don´t think Mushkin could buy different MLC (16nm Micron), maybe the LT have NAND with more GB/Chip? I think 460MB/s is more than slighty to 305MB/s]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.thessdreview.com/ces-2016/mushkin-ces-2016-update/#comment-22946">CBarr</a>.</p>
<p>The LT seems to be new. It is listed in Germany since end of january 2016.</p>
<p>The controller is identical. I don´t think Mushkin could buy different MLC (16nm Micron), maybe the LT have NAND with more GB/Chip? I think 460MB/s is more than slighty to 305MB/s</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: CBarr		</title>
		<link>https://www.thessdreview.com/ces-2016/mushkin-ces-2016-update/#comment-22946</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CBarr]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Feb 2016 22:26:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.thessdreview.com/?p=90837#comment-22946</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.thessdreview.com/ces-2016/mushkin-ces-2016-update/#comment-22945&quot;&gt;Scour&lt;/a&gt;.

I believe the reactor replaced the reactor LT (although I haven&#039;t ever/heard of it) since they are very similar . (MLC,slightly lower iops and slightly lower speeds)]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.thessdreview.com/ces-2016/mushkin-ces-2016-update/#comment-22945">Scour</a>.</p>
<p>I believe the reactor replaced the reactor LT (although I haven&#8217;t ever/heard of it) since they are very similar . (MLC,slightly lower iops and slightly lower speeds)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Scour		</title>
		<link>https://www.thessdreview.com/ces-2016/mushkin-ces-2016-update/#comment-22945</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Scour]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Feb 2016 19:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.thessdreview.com/?p=90837#comment-22945</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.thessdreview.com/ces-2016/mushkin-ces-2016-update/#comment-22944&quot;&gt;CBarr&lt;/a&gt;.

Thanksfor these links, but I still wonder the Reactor LT-series is not listed at Mushkin]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.thessdreview.com/ces-2016/mushkin-ces-2016-update/#comment-22944">CBarr</a>.</p>
<p>Thanksfor these links, but I still wonder the Reactor LT-series is not listed at Mushkin</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
