Samsung SM951 M.2 PCIe SSD Review (512GB)

TSSDR TEST BENCH AND PROTOCOL

SSD testing at TSSDR differs slightly, depending on whether we are looking at consumer or enterprise SSDs. For consumer SSDs, our goal is to test in a system that has been optimized with our SSD Optimization Guide. To see the best performance possible the CPU C states have been disabled, C1E support has been disabled, Enhanced Intel SpeedStep Technology (EIST) has been disabled. Benchmarks for consumer testing are also benchmarks with a fresh drive so, not only can we verify that manufacturer specifications are in line but also, so the consumer can replicate our tests to confirm that they have an SSD that is top-notch. We even provide links to most of the benchmarks used in the report.

Sean Consumer Test Bench Core V51

SYSTEM COMPONENTS

This Test Bench build was the result of some great relationships and purchase; our appreciation goes to those who jumped in specifically to help the cause. Key contributors to this build are our friends at ASRock for the motherboard and CPU and be quiet! for the PSU and cooling fans. Also, a big thank you to Thermaltake for the case and Kingston for the RAM. We have detailed all components in the table below and they are all linked should you wish to make a duplicate of our system as so many seem to do, or check out the price of any single component. As always, we appreciate your support in any purchase through our links!

PC CHASSIS: Thermaltake Core V51
MOTHERBOARD: ASRock Z97 Extreme6
CPU: Intel Core i5-4670K
CPU COOLER: Corsair H75
POWER SUPPLY: be quiet! Dark Power Pro 10 850W
SYSTEM COOLING: be quiet! Silent Wings 2
MEMORY: Kingston HyperX Beast 2400Mhz
STORAGE: Samsung 850 Pro

BENCHMARK SOFTWARE

The software in use for today’s analysis is typical of many of our reviews and consists of ATTO Disk Benchmark, Crystal Disk Info, Crystal Disk Mark, AS SSD, Anvil’s Storage Utilities, Iometer, TRIMcheck, PCMark Vantage, and PCMark 8. We prefer to test with easily accessible software that the consumer can obtain, and in many cases, we even provide links. Our selection of software allows each to build on the last and to provide validation to results already obtained.

CRYSTAL DISK INFO VER. 6.3.0

Crystal Disk Info is a great tool for displaying the characteristics and health of storage devices. It displays everything from temperatures, to the number of hours the device has been powered, and even to the extent of informing you of the firmware of the device.

Samsung SM951 512GB CDICrystal Disk Info shows us some Vender Specific attributes as well as some of the now typical useful ones such as Total Host Reads and Writes counters.  It also shows a working temperature sensor and has TRIM support over the PCIe interface. The firmware version we are testing with today is BXW2500Q.

TRIMCHECK

We’ve covered TRIMcheck in the past. It is a great tool that easily lets us see if TRIM is actually functioning on a SSD volume in your system.

Samsung SM951 512GB TRIM

As it should have, TRIMcheck came back with positive results and this SSD supports TRIM in our system.

ATTO DISK BENCHMARK VER. 2.47

ATTO Disk Benchmark is perhaps one of the oldest benchmarks going and is definitely the main staple for manufacturer performance specifications. ATTO uses RAW or compressible data and, for our benchmarks, we use a set length of 256mb and test both the read and write performance of various transfer sizes ranging from 0.5 to 8192kb. Manufacturers prefer this method of testing as it deals with raw (compressible) data rather than random (includes incompressible data) which, although more realistic, results in lower performance results.

Samsung SM951 512GB ATTO

ATTO shows off some great initial results. We see very strong small file size speeds with the 4KB file size reaching over 400MB/s. Write speeds reach around their max of 1.6GB/s with the 32KB file size and reads hit 2.26GB/s with the 512KB file size and on.

34
Leave a Reply

avatar
10 Comment threads
24 Thread replies
0 Followers
 
Most reacted comment
Hottest comment thread
18 Comment authors
skeptomenosellinCamilo UribeArturLes@TheSSDReviewMuthukumar Natarajan Recent comment authors
  Subscribe  
newest oldest most voted
Notify of
Mike
Guest
Mike

How does Samsung consistently end up on top of all other ssds? You have all these major players, Intel , Crucial , Toshiba , SanDisk. Every now and then someone gives them a challenge, but they seem to always end up back on top. Is it there controller, nand, firmware, controller/nand, what?
And if you raid 0 two sata SanDisk extreme pros can you get
the same consistency bandwidth as one of these m2 drives?

Les@TheSSDReview
Guest

Samsung is a marketing Goliath. Because they are the largest tech company in the world (selling 4 cell phones and 2 TVs every second of the day), they have the resources to sink into their products. People buy Samsung SSDs just for the name because they recognize that name and trust it. Don’t get me wrong; the other companies are giants in their own right and, given the right marketing tactics, could compete with Samsung. They just aren’t there yet…or maybe they just haven’t made that right step. Want an example? Intel is the worlds top CPU. Could they not… Read more »

Mike
Guest
Mike

Thanks that was a very good explanation. But what about the second question? If you raid 0 two sata SanDisk extreme pros can you get
the same consistency bandwidth as one of these m2 drives? The SanDisk had half bandwidth 200-250, so times 2 400-450 could it compete. I only ask because I have a old motherboard with no more pcie slots.

Les@TheSSDReview
Guest

No the SanDisk RAID would not come close. Even with 100% incompressible data, this drive transfers data at speeds of 1.9GB/s read, 1.5GB/s write and 175K IOPS. This SSD is a blessing for those working in 4K media where a minimum of 1.4GB/s is necessary. I always speak of the importance of understanding ones need however and, with that, matching the right SSD with the task at hand. Does the typical PC user need this or will they ever understand its abilities? Absolutely not…but it is still sweet though isn’t it?

Diego Valenzuela Ossa
Guest
Diego Valenzuela Ossa

today samsung evo 850 is technically the best deal for price and quality. and probably going for this SM951 card next year. my choice to buy the model I had wasn’t actually based on the brand name

Whydoyoucloseyoureyes
Guest
Whydoyoucloseyoureyes

not a single review site has tested boot times with this disk. not one!!!

Les@TheSSDReview
Guest

Boot times differ for the most part by seconds and cannot be measured accurately as each system is different. The importance of boot times is seen between the hard drive and the SSD. To compare SSD boot times is a defeating task as the boot time, for the most part, is based on disk access times for which most SSDs are a fraction of a ms different.

Whydoyoucloseyoureyes
Guest
Whydoyoucloseyoureyes

thank you for the feedback! but there are cases where boot time tested on a specific motherboard can reveal quite a difference, for instance the intel 750 ssd has the slowest boot time of any high end ssd, while the sm951 supposedly has the absolute fastest of all consumer ssds. like several seconds difference actually.

http://techreport.com/review/28050/intel-750-series-solid-state-drive-reviewed/5

Les@TheSSDReview
Guest

I understand your point and appreciate the work that my friends at TechReport do. I have had every one of those SSDs in use in one system or another in one point in time or another and I have never experienced a 30 second boot. In fact, my system optimization is always the same and my start times are typically 15-20 seconds when fully optimized with our SSD Optimization Guide. There are VAST differences in boards and, as such, a significant start time difference will be experienced between newer NVME compatible boards and those of just yesterday that relied on… Read more »

Steve W
Guest
Steve W

It would be interesting to understand a bit more about this variability in boot time. Dust off the ol’ SAS program and collect a large amount of data and get real nerdy with it!

Sean Webster
Guest

I did, I booted off this SSD in about 7-8 seconds as stated under the bootability section in the review on the first page. The Intel 750 booted similarly as other SSDs as well when I had it.

Whydoyoucloseyoureyes
Guest
Whydoyoucloseyoureyes

i had the 750, it booted real slow, like stupid slow compared to my old 120gb corsair. i have the 850 pro now and its insane compared to the 750.

Also i could not install hackintosh on my 750 which sucks , but hackintosh does have sm951 support 🙂

I also have the asrock extreme6 so i can buy the sm951 and use it if i needed, but tbh the 850 pro in daily usage is just as fast. and the sm951 has throttling issues. try placing a fan over it and see if performance increase?

Mikac
Guest
Mikac

booted in 10 sec (i5+DDR 1600 Mhz+sm951 AHCI)

xyvyx
Guest
xyvyx

I posted my 2nd boot on Youtube the day I received the drive… sorry the video quality on my phone sucks, but you can see how long it takes!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tRFyBqKCXkc

If you want to see even faster Samsung drives in a 4-way mirror (2 column, 2 copy in Storage Spaces), look at my last post here… fastest SSD config I’ve ever seen:

https://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/ad5fe5bc-715d-418d-92a4-3bdb94eb7948/pcie-ssd-storage-spaces-huge-read-performance-drop

Eric
Guest
Eric

Hi Les,

Thanks for the review.

If you’re interested, there’s a newer version of AS-SSD (v1.8.5608.42992).

Les@TheSSDReview
Guest

Thanks! WE are looking at that right now and deciding when we want to move it in to our reports.

allesichmacheichmacheesfurmich
Guest
allesichmacheichmacheesfurmich

What is the issue with this thing that potentially bricks it with a secure erase?

mugenmundo
Guest
mugenmundo

I would like to upgrade my Vaio pro 13 pcie SSD samsung xp941 to the new sm951 would this be compatible?

Les@TheSSDReview
Guest

The AHCI version would be yes.

Muthukumar Natarajan
Guest
Muthukumar Natarajan

Is this tested? Especially, does the SONY VAIO Pro 13 boot from SM951 (512GB)? Could you please point to anywhere wherein someone has it actually tested and the result available?
I know, technically it should work, but don’t want to take a chance while I buy.
Many Thanks!

Les@TheSSDReview
Guest

Of course it will work but I would go for the newest 950 pro now.

Muthukumar Natarajan
Guest
Muthukumar Natarajan

Sorry, I too know that technically it should work, but I was more looking for actual experience, especially regarding whether it Boots.

Also, regarding the 950 Pro, I know it is based on NVMe, whereas the SONY VAIO Pro supports only AHCI as far as I know. So when you recommend 950 Pro for SONY VAIO Pro, how is it going to work?:
1. By itself? (I wonder how) _OR_
2. Any BIOS Update available for SONY VAIO Pro for NVMe support? _OR_
3. Is 950 Pro by any chance backward compatible with AHCI (again, Bootable?)

Thanks!

Les@TheSSDReview
Guest

Woops my apologies; 950 pro will not work and the SM951 (AHCI version) will.

Artur
Guest
Artur

SM951 will not work in Pro13 people don’t waste your time and money like me. XP941 is best you can get for Pro 13 tried both in my Pro 13 other people having same problem with SM951 won’t work as bootable partition!

Artur
Guest
Artur

SM951 AHCI I mean

Camilo Uribe
Guest
Camilo Uribe

Why the SM951 AHCI not works in the vaio pro13 ? thanks.

SSD QUICK SEARCH