Mushkin Triactor SSD Review (480GB) – Another Barebones TLC Option

REAL WORLD FILE TRANSFER

We also wanted to see how performance was in a real world use when transferring large files to the SSD. For this test we are going to simply stress write performance by transferring over a 30GB folder of movies off of a 512GB Samsung 950 Pro to the test SSDs and time how long it takes. Once complete we can calculate the average speed. For reference we have included both a 2.5″ and 3.5″ WD Blue HDD.

Mushkin Triactor SSD 30GB file Transfer

In this test the Mushkin Triactor shows its true weakness, large file transfer write performance.  While it is not as slow as the Crucial BX200 series SSDs, it is still slower than a standard desktop HDD and slower than the Intel 540s by nearly 50MB/s.

POWER CONSUMPTION

For our power consumption testing, we have the drive connected to the system as a secondary drive. To record the wattage, we are now utilizing a Quarch Technology Programmable Power Module. It allows us to accurately measure power consumption over time and is flexible enough to allow us to test any SSD that comes our way.

Quarch Technology Power Module Angle

Our power analysis may change as time goes on, but for now we are looking at just a few metrics with the main goal of measuring our results against the manufacturer’s ratings. Because most consumer systems are at idle for about 80% of the time, idle power consumption is an important measure to look at when understanding the efficiency of a drive.

Mushkin Triactor SSD IDLE Power Consumption

In this comparison we can see that the Mushkin Triactor did very well. Idle power consumption is only 43 milliwatts, this places it lower than our 2.5″ HDD and much lower than that of our 3.5″ HDD comparisons. In relation to the rest of the SSDs on the graph, the result is rather impressive.

POWER EFFICIENCY

Finally, we wanted to post up a graph of the power efficiency of the SSDs in comparison. We are looking at MB/s per Watt in this graph. The higher the result, the better.

Mushkin Triactor SSD 30GB Efficiency

Lastly, we can see that in this comparison, the Mushkin Triactor is still near the end of the herd. It does, however, beat out the BX200 series by quite a bit by being twice as efficient.

5
Leave a Reply

avatar
4 Comment threads
1 Thread replies
0 Followers
 
Most reacted comment
Hottest comment thread
5 Comment authors
yobrettJohnnyLCopy EditordanielBenjamin Hojnik Recent comment authors
  Subscribe  
newest oldest most voted
Notify of
Benjamin Hojnik
Guest
Benjamin Hojnik

Wait, does are 256Gbit dies or just two 128Gbit dies stacked on top of eachother ?

daniel
Guest
daniel

The big problem with their (Mushkin) drives is there is no software that comes with the drive so I can upgrade from my HDD. I have to go find something to clone my drive with that I can trust then find another trustworthy download to maintain my drive with then there is no way to update the firmware when needed that I know of. Not a complete package so I went with OCZ.

JohnnyL
Guest
JohnnyL

Who cares. Plenty of free cloning software if you use something called Google.

Copy Editor
Guest
Copy Editor

SanDisk DOES NOT manufacture 1nm chips, please edit your article, page 1. : “1znm” does NOT exist.

yobrett
Guest
yobrett

I’m curious if this would work well as a secondary drive for the XBox One. It seems like it’s be fairly slow getting games loaded onto it at first, but after that, do you think it’d offer better load times than the stock Xbox drive?

SSD QUICK SEARCH