ADATA XPG SX900 256GB SATA 3 SSD Review – Expanded Capacity and SandForce Driven Speed

CRYSTAL DISK BENCHMARK VER. 3.0 X64

Crystal Disk Benchmark is used to measure read and write performance through sampling of raw (0/1 Fill/compressible) or random data which is, for the most part, incompressible. Many new SandForce Driven SSD owners who cant wait to test the performance of their SSD often grab this program and run a quick test, not realizing that they are testing with incompressible data rather than compressible data used in testing by manufacturers.  We have provided compressible (oFill) results on the left with incompressible (random data) results on the right.

The XPG is looking stronger with every test.  Low 4k random writes are up there with 90MB/s but, even better, the high sequential write transfer speed performance above 300MB/s when testing in highly incompressible, or random data, was amazing.  This was totally unexpected as this was the point where we first thought we might see that trade off in performance for that extra 7% capacity gain.

AS SSD BENCHMARK VER 1.64

Up until recently, AS SSD was the only benchmark created specifically for SSD testing and it uses incompressible data.  AS SSD, for the most part, gives us the worst case scenario in SSD transfer speeds while using SandForce Driven SSDs as they use compression in storage as discussed earlier.  Many enthusiasts like to benchmark with AS SSD for their needs.

Once again, these are some of the higher scores we have seen from ‘SandForce Driven’ SSDs and, although the IOPS may appear to be a bit low, this is typical of AS SSD IOPS results.

AS SSD Copy Bench is a very realistic benchmark, in that, it simply measures the transfer speed and time it takes to transfer a typical ISO, program and game from one part of the disk to another.  These are excellent results. Lets take a look at the AS SSD Compression Test:

ANVIL STORAGE UTILITIES PROFESSIONAL

Over the last little while, we have been assisting with beta testing new benchmark software called Anvil Storage Utilities which is an absolutely amazing SSD benchmarking utility.  Not only does it have a preset SSD benchmark, but also, it has included such things as endurance testing and threaded I/O read, write and mixed tests, all of which are very simple to understand and utilize in our benchmark testing.

The definite pluses seen in this benchmark include the quick disk access speeds as well as something that we don’t often see in SandForce Driven SSDs, this being strong read and write IOPS results as shown with the 68, 213 IOPS result at 4k0QD16 read and the 83,013 IOPS result at 4k-QD16 write. This could very well be the top drive we have reviewed in awhile.

11
Leave a Reply

avatar
7 Comment threads
4 Thread replies
0 Followers
 
Most reacted comment
Hottest comment thread
5 Comment authors
ThomasLes@TheSSDReviewDaraby02dravo1Christopher Recent comment authors
  Subscribe  
newest oldest most voted
Notify of
Christopher
Guest
Christopher

I don’t think it’s entirely unexpected that ditching RAISE would help increase speeds somewhat. After all, the drive isn’t having to write the necessary parity(?) data anymore to recover from a die failure. With that said, I’ve seen increased write performance from SF’s using the new reference 5.02a FW anyway.

So it looks like you do get slightly better performance overall and more capacity in exchange for less failure tolerance.

dravo1
Guest
dravo1

It would be interesting to run a pair of these in RAID 0 to see what the low RAISE does to performance.

Daraby02
Guest
Daraby02

Can’t see how there would be any major surprises, Crucial have been using the 0% over-provisioning for years, The only over-provisioning they’ve had has been the difference between the size of actual memory modules ( gigabytes ) and the actual size of the ssd drive ( Gibibytes ) it still leaves 7% difference for over-provisioning, which is classed as 0%.

More over-provisioning still makes for a better ssd drive where it matters, but I guess size is everything as far as the market is concerned.

PommieB

Muhammad Al-Jawhary
Guest

This is a great review you have there as usual 🙂

I am Muhammad Al-Jawhary, an Arab reviewer and technical editor, and I have a 128GB sample of the drive that I have reviewed here:

http://www.arabpcworld.com/forum/showthread.php?t=4918

That makes us two sides of the same coin, you have done the only review in English (as far as I know), and I have done the first and only review in Arabic, too 😀

The performance is great, and it has 8 GB more than its brother; the S511.

Les@TheSSDReview
Guest

Ummm isnt that my photo of ‘all the ssds’ in your review? I would appreciate the link back to our site and article if you are using any of our literature or piks.

Muhammad Al-Jawhary
Guest

Thanks for your reply, it is a great pleasure to be here 🙂

Actually, it is your pic, and the pic has a hyperlink embedded (If you press the image, you will be directed to the great article).

We may have some future cooperation together, I may be able to translate some of your guides and articles and post them in the Arab world, and of course, the credit is all yours, not mine.

Les@TheSSDReview
Guest

When I click on the pik, it brings me only to the pik…. Can we fix the link so it goes to the article? And yes, I am sure we can affiliate post for one another in the future.

Muhammad Al-Jawhary
Guest

Actually, the image has a hyperlink as I said before, but the site uses a script to show the images, which in turn hides the hyperlink. Nonetheless, I have added a credit line under the photo that contains the link. Sorry for the inconvenience 🙂

Have you seen those numbers I got with the drive? They used asynchronous NAND flashes with the 128GB version! The same NANDs used with Kingston’s SSDNow V+200.

Thomas
Guest
Thomas

There is a slight inaccuracy in your reviews which is (implicitly) already mentioned above, but which i’d like to clear up. Flash memory has raw capacities of binary powers, this one e. g. has a raw capacity of 256 * 2^30 = 274877906944 bytes = 256 “GiBi” Bytes. Vendors prefer to use decimal powers, as the numbers are slightly higher, so this SSD has a raw capacity of 275 * 10^9 Bytes = 275 GB. 7% of these are used for over-provisioning leaving the user with 256 GB = 238 GiB. Windows, again, uses binary powers to display drive capacities,… Read more »