Comments on: Samsung Pro Plus microSDHC 32GB and EVO Plus 128GB microSDXC Review https://www.thessdreview.com/featured/samsung-pro-plus-microsdhc-32gb-and-evo-plus-128gb-microsdxc-review/ The Worlds Dedicated SSD Education and Review Resource | Mon, 14 Mar 2016 01:11:00 +0000 hourly 1 By: Ari Goldman https://www.thessdreview.com/featured/samsung-pro-plus-microsdhc-32gb-and-evo-plus-128gb-microsdxc-review/#comment-23016 Mon, 14 Mar 2016 01:11:00 +0000 https://www.thessdreview.com/?p=88345#comment-23016 In reply to Javier Molina.

Based on what ive seen, it seems the 128gb version of the EVO+ is slower than the smaller versions at rand read/write.

I assumed all the versions would be roughly the same speed, but apparently thats not the case.

]]> By: Javier Molina https://www.thessdreview.com/featured/samsung-pro-plus-microsdhc-32gb-and-evo-plus-128gb-microsdxc-review/#comment-22698 Tue, 24 Nov 2015 22:40:00 +0000 https://www.thessdreview.com/?p=88345#comment-22698 Why is it that the first gen EVO had Crystal Disk 4K write speeds of 1.48 vs the EVO plus of only .86? Also on other reviews the EVO has large block random write speeds of 32.0 vs the EVO plus of only 3.9.

]]> By: Amur https://www.thessdreview.com/featured/samsung-pro-plus-microsdhc-32gb-and-evo-plus-128gb-microsdxc-review/#comment-22085 Sat, 25 Jul 2015 04:01:00 +0000 https://www.thessdreview.com/?p=88345#comment-22085 PRO plus has still using MLC?

]]>