LSI 9265-8i MegaRAID Card vs Adaptec 6805 RAID Card – The Ultimate 6Gb/s RAID Showdown

OWC MERCURY PRO – PCMARK VANTAGE RESULTS

In PCMark Vantage the data simply cannot be manipulated, and a result is provided based on the transfer speeds observed in eight simulated user activities. This is a trace based test, several recorded traces of user activity are used to simulate actual usage. This benchmark uses both mixed read/write tests and is a good test for overall performance.

There are eight tests in all and the tests performed record the speed of data movement in MB/s to which they are then given a numerical score after all of the tests are complete. The simulations are as follows:

  • Windows Defender In Use
  • Streaming Data from storage in games such as Alan Wake which allows for massive worlds and riveting non-stop action
  • Importing digital photos into Windows Photo Gallery
  • Starting the Vista Operating System
  • Home Video editing with Movie Maker which can be very time consuming
  • Media Center which can handle video recording, time shifting and streaming from Windows media center to an extender such as XBox
  • Cataloging a music library
  • Starting applications

The LSI 9265-8i scores an impressive 134418 points, and the Adaptec comes in with 44509. This type of trace-based benchmark really illustrates the difference in performance of the two solutions, especially when they come under realistic loading scenarios. Unfortunately many synthetic tests merely show the absolutely best case scenario and in real life, the user may experience something else entirely.

The 9265 definitely stretches its legs with the large sequential access of tasks such as importing pictures, but it also shows its agility with the random access types of data such as application loading.

42
Leave a Reply

avatar
28 Comment threads
14 Thread replies
0 Followers
 
Most reacted comment
Hottest comment thread
22 Comment authors
NormlaurensE71rsqMoheban79 Recent comment authors
  Subscribe  
newest oldest most voted
Notify of
Eero Rantala
Guest
Eero Rantala

I unfortunately have the Adaptec 6805 controller and… LOL… where is my garbage can…
I’m running a setup with 4x Kingston 240GB HyperX in R5, the ATTO results arent that shabby… I get 1.5GB/s write and 2.1GB/s read (seq) but…. the short random reads are just terrible… in Winsat it’s only 170 MB/s(!?!).
Funny thing is that when I turn off controller cache I get 9000 MB/s in sequential 64 read… 🙂
I dont however get more than 5ms max response time vs your 55ms value.

Eero Rantala
Guest
Eero Rantala

Winsat with all cache OFF (Swedish W7): > Disk Sequential 64.0 Read 8922.99 MB/s 7.9 > Disk Random 16.0 Read 183.16 MB/s 7.6 > Responsiveness: Average IO Rate 1.01 ms/IO 7.9 > Responsiveness: Grouped IOs 7.94 units 7.5 > Responsiveness: Long IOs 1.98 units 7.9 > Responsiveness: Overall 15.69 units 7.9 > Responsiveness: PenaltyFactor 0.0 > Disk Sequential 64.0 Write 576.71 MB/s 7.9 > Genomsnittlig l„stid med sekventiella skriv†tg„rder0.494 ms 7.9 > Svarstid: 95:e percentilen 0.936 ms 7.9 > Svarstid: maximal 2.820 ms 7.9 > Genomsnittlig l„stid med slumpm„ssiga skrivningar0.542 ms 7.9

Eero Rantala
Guest
Eero Rantala

Winsat all cache ON: > Disk Sequential 64.0 Read 1207.40 MB/s 7.9 > Disk Random 16.0 Read 170.22 MB/s 7.6 > Responsiveness: Average IO Rate 0.26 ms/IO 7.9 > Responsiveness: Grouped IOs 4.58 units 7.9 > Responsiveness: Long IOs 0.45 units 7.9 > Responsiveness: Overall 2.04 units 7.9 > Responsiveness: PenaltyFactor 0.0 > Disk Sequential 64.0 Write 882.76 MB/s 7.9 > Genomsnittlig l„stid med sekventiella skriv†tg„rder0.239 ms 7.9 > Svarstid: 95:e percentilen 1.013 ms 7.9 > Svarstid: maximal 5.359 ms 7.9 > Genomsnittlig l„stid med slumpm„ssiga skrivningar0.326 ms 7.9

Eero Rantala
Guest
Eero Rantala

Next steps to do:
PC –> Adaptec –> Garbage bin
LSI –> PC

Eero Rantala
Guest
Eero Rantala

Hahaaa… my 6805 beats the LSI in the AS SSD copy benchmark 2 of 3:
ISO 880 / 1.22
Program 377 / 3.73
Game 701 / 1.97